1540 - Standing Rules of the University Faculty
- Name: Francesca Sammarruca
- Position: Professor
- Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Last updated: July 01, 2020
A. Voting Privilege
B. Referral of Catalog-Change Proposals
C. Circulation of Curricular and Policy Proposals
D. Admission of Nonmembers to Faculty Meetings
E. Procedures for First Fall Meeting
G. Identification of Speakers
A. VOTING PRIVILEGE. Constituent faculties of colleges and other UI units must limit the voting privilege to those who are qualified under the provisions of the constitution of the university faculty. (See 1520 II-1 and II-3.) Moreover, those who are qualified cannot be deprived of their vote in meetings of constituent faculties. (See 1520 IV-8.)Emeritus and adjunct faculty, staff, students, and others may be permitted to participate in faculty meetings in an advisory capacity only, and they may serve as voting members of committees (see FSH 1520 Article II, Section 3 for affiliate voting rights).
A-1. Eligible faculty (see 1520 II-1) who are unable to attend in person can participate fully in faculty meetings through remote meeting and voting technology. Information on how to participate and vote from remote locations is provided prior to the meeting. Participation in person, when possible, is encouraged.
B. REFERRAL OF CATALOG-CHANGE PROPOSALS. When substantive catalog changes of a curricular nature that have not been considered by the University Curriculum Committee are presented directly to the university faculty, such proposals are referred automatically to the University Curriculum Committee for study and recommendation.
C. CIRCULATION OF CURRICULAR AND POLICY PROPOSALS.
C-1. Routine Catalog-Change Proposals. Additions, deletions, and changes of courses and changes in existing curricula may, after approval by the University Curriculum Committee, be circulated in a general curriculum report (GPR) to the faculty for consideration and published at an appropriate UI web-site.
C-2. Policy-Change Proposals. Proposals that affect university policy see FSH 1460. General university academic requirements, e.g., those in part 3 of the catalog, or that concern the addition or expansion of instructional programs may, after approval by the Faculty Senate, be circulated in a general policy report (GPR) to the faculty for consideration. The report is also published on the Faculty Senate web-site and its publication announced through electronic means to the faculty.
C-3. Actions of the University Curriculum Committee and of the Faculty Senate that are circulated in general curriculum-policy reports (C-1 and C-2) are considered to have the necessary faculty approvals unless a petition requesting further consideration of specific items is signed by five faculty members and submitted to the chair of the Faculty Senate within 14 calendar days after the date of circulation. If no petition is received within 14 days, the entire report is submitted to the president for approval and transmittal to the regents, if regents' action is required.
C-4. If a petition is received, the items in the report for which further consideration is requested will be referred to the Faculty Senate, and the remainder of the report will move forward. On items referred to it, the senate may (a) affirm the action and report it to a meeting of the university faculty, (b) amend the action and report it to a meeting of the university faculty, or (c) rescind the action. (NOTE: If a petition concerns courses or curricula in the College of Letters and Science or in the College of Agriculture, and is signed by five faculty members of the respective college, those items will be returned to the college concerned for further consideration.)
C-5. Faculty Approval. Any policy item approved by Senate and not circulated on a general policy report will be included in the agenda of the next appropriate university faculty meeting for faculty approval. Items approved at a university faculty meeting are forwarded to the president for approval and transmittal to the regents, if regents' action is required. See 1420 A-1 c for time periods for presidential action on Faculty Senate items.
C-6. Interim Approval. If there is insufficient opportunity for the faculty to act on a routine catalog-change proposal (see C-1) between the time of its approval by the University Curriculum Committee and the date that it is to be effective, it may be reported directly to the president. Upon approval by the president, the change will be considered temporarily approved for implementation. Such interim approval is valid only until the end of the succeeding semester. Actions thus approved will be reported to the faculty at the earliest possible time, either in the agenda for a faculty meeting or in a general curriculum-policy report. Continuing approval of the change is subject to ratification at a faculty meeting or by the procedures described in C-3 and C-4. (To illustrate: Late in the spring semester, the University Curriculum Committee approves a routine catalog change that is to be effective during the next fall semester. That action is reported to the president and, if approved by the president, the change can be put into effect. If it is included in a curriculum-policy report that is circulated to the resident faculty early in the fall semester, the approval of the change may, by means of the steps outlined in C-3 and C-4, become permanent or it may be terminated at the end of that semester. Alternatively, the faculty may take either of these actions in a meeting if the change is included in the agenda.)
D. ADMISSION OF NONMEMBERS TO FACULTY MEETINGS. Nonmembers are welcome to attend meetings of the university faculty. Nonmembers who wish to speak at such a meeting must submit a request to the faculty secretary at least two business days in advance of the meeting specifying both the topic and purpose of their comments. The faculty secretary shall notify the senate chair and the President's Office. The president and chair will decide whether to allow the guest to speak. All nonmember speakers must identify themselves at the onset of their remarks.
E. PROCEDURES FOR FIRST FALL MEETING.
E-1. Within the first six weeks of the fall semester, the president shall convene a meeting of the University Faculty for the purpose of introducing new academic and administrative officers, as well as new faculty. The president may also present brief remarks and respond to questions from faculty.
E-2. Substantive policy matters are not included in the agenda for the first fall meeting of the university faculty unless emergency action is needed on particular items.
E-3. To expedite the proceedings, each new member of the faculty attending the meeting is introduced by name and department only. Faculty members outside of Moscow are similarly introduced by video conferencing.
The person's name, degrees, past experience, new assignment, campus telephone number, and the location of his or her office are supplied by each dean or division head to the president's office by the 10th day of the fall semester.
The president's office compiles the information provided by colleges or similar units and posts it on the University's website no later than October 1 of each year. A copy will also be sent to the Department of Special Collections and Archives in the University Library.
F. MINUTES. Minutes of the meetings of the university faculty, constituent faculties, and committees are to be sent on a regular basis to the Department of Special Collections and Archives in the University Library.
G. IDENTIFICATION OF SPEAKERS. Those who are recognized by the chair for the purpose of speaking at meetings of the university faculty are to identify themselves by name and discipline or position.
Amended July 2020. A-1 was revised to allow for remote participation in university faculty meetings.
Amended January 2017. Changes in E were made to update processes for the fall university faculty meeting.
Amended July 2012. Changes were made to D in order to align with Idaho’s open meeting law and clarify non-members’ attendance at faculty meetings.
Amended January 2012. Processes were clarified and updated to current practice.
Amended July 2011. Processes were clarified and updated to current practice.
Amended July 2009. Constitutional changes giving off-campus faculty voting rights at faculty meetings necessitated adding venue determination to A.
Amended July 2002. Editorial changes.