University of Idaho - I Banner
A student works at a computer


U of I's web-based retention and advising tool provides an efficient way to guide and support students on their road to graduation. Login to VandalStar.


As experts in the field and/or discipline, faculty assess student performance of program learning outcomes throughout the student’s program of study. They then use this data to make improvements in the curriculum or classroom to improve how well students master the program learning outcomes.
The Faculty Staff Handbook (FSH 1565) articulates that “active participation in the assessment of learning outcomes is expected of all faculty at the course, program and university-wide levels” as part of the teaching responsibility in the position description. This is consistent with the University of Idaho’s national accreditor’s expectation that “The institution recognizes the central role of faculty to establish curricula, assess student learning, and improve instructional programs” (NWCCU, Standard 1.C.5).

Faculty Participation

Assessment is intentional and requires planning and collaboration. Faculty are encouraged to plan for assessment at the beginning of each semester. Failure to plan in advance may create more work for you or your colleagues.

Here are some things to consider:

General Education vs. Program Learning Outcomes

Faculty teaching a general education course during the semester are asked to contribute assessment data for that course. Data should be collected on a minimum of 2 general education outcomes. Faculty who are not teaching a general education course during the semester are expected to contribute assessment data in support of the program learning outcomes. Data should be collected on a minimum of 1 program learning outcome.

Assessment Cycle

Faculty should be familiar with their program learning outcomes and the established assessment cycle for their program. Faculty unfamiliar with the program’s assessment cycle should inquire with their department chair by the beginning of the semester.

Method for Providing Assessment Data

Programs may have a preference for how faculty submit their assessment data each semester. See “Contributing Assessment Data” for available options, and be sure to check with your department chair if you are unsure which method your program uses. The data collected will become a part of the program’s overall data collection effort and should be consistent with the program’s assessment plan.

Selecting or Creating an Assignment or Measure

Faculty are encouraged to use an embedded assessment – assignments, projects, exams or other activities that are completed by students as part of your course. In most cases, faculty can repurpose an existing course requirement by taking a second look at it with an assessment lens.

The assignment or course activity must provide the student an appropriate opportunity to demonstrate the program learning outcome. Using the program learning outcome as the guide, consider the various requirements in your courses to determine which assignment or activity provides the best opportunity for students to demonstrate that learning. This assignment or activity can be used for embedded assessment. In most cases, you will not report the overall assignment or activity grade. Instead, you will take a second look on this particular course requirement and assess only the student’s performance on the program learning outcome. You will answer, “how well did the student demonstrate the program learning outcome?” The data you collect for this question is what is reported for assessment purposes and may differ from the assignment grade.

It is helpful to know in advance what criteria to use when evaluating an assignment or activity. You will need to know the answer to, “what evidence should the student show in their work, to have mastered the program learning outcome by graduation?” If you are unsure of what is expected by program graduates, check with your department chair. Remember that depending on where your embedded assessment is within the student’s curriculum, they may not yet be expected to “master” the outcome. They may have only mastered a part of the outcome or may still be making progress in all parts. The data you collect helps the program understand the student’s performance on the program learning outcome throughout the curriculum (freshman, sophomore, junior, senior, etc.), not specifically in your course.

In some cases, faculty may need to create a new assignment or activity if nothing existing can be repurposed. Additionally, some programs may use signature assignments where the program uses a standardized rubric or assessment in all courses to track student performance on an outcome. This is coordinated and communicated at the department level.

The Pros and Cons of Teaching Soil Fertility Live Versus Online
Robert L. Mahler, Ph.D., Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, U of I

Contributing Assessment Data

The University of Idaho’s assessment management system, Anthology, provides several methods for providing your assessment data each semester. Please check with your department chair, if you are unsure which option your program uses.

Note: An integration with Anthology and our learning management system (LMS) is expected in January 2022. This option will be added here when it is available.

Assessment Data for Individual Students

Beginning with Fall 2021 courses, assessment data should be reported for each student assessed. This is a change. Faculty will no longer be reporting how well students performed on an assessment as a group (for example: 80% of students or 21 students met the outcome). Instead, faculty will now be reporting on each individual student (for example: Joe Vandal’s score was an 85). If you do not understand this change, please email for clarification.

This change allows us to both aggregate, and disaggregate data, in our analysis. As a result, we can identify patterns and trends to better support student achievement for all students and identify equity gaps in our programs.

Option One: Reporting Data Using Anthology Rubrics

All faculty have access to Anthology Rubrics.

The Anthology Rubrics tool provides a quick way to create a rubric that can be used for assessment purposes. Depending on your program, a rubric designed to measure a specific learning outcome may be standardized for use across courses and assignments. Or the tool may be used by an individual faculty member to assess students in a single course and contribute this data easily to a program learning outcome.

Anthology Rubrics allow you to:

  • Create a rubric from scratch, or adapt a pre-loaded rubric for your own use.
  • Use a rubric you created, or that was shared with you, to quickly evaluate students in your course on a program learning outcome. The rubric can be reused in other semesters/courses.
  • Easily captures the individual student scores for the program.
  • Provides a way to automate sharing your data with your program’s assessment coordinator or department chair.
  • Can be combined with Option 2 to upload student-level data.


You will not be able to provide summary comments on how well students did as a whole, using the Rubrics tool alone. You will only be able to add comments to individual student’s performance, if you choose. If you have summary comments, this will need to be shared with your program another way. You can follow “option 1,” with “option 2,” to add summary comments, and directly share your data with your program. If you do this, you do not need to add your department chair/program head as an evaluator (as follows).

To share your assessment data with your department chair or an assessment coordinator, add them as an evaluator:

  1. Within the assessment, click the “Tools” button in the top right corner
  2. Select “Manage Evaluators” from the dropdown
  3. Start typing their name and select from the drop-down list
  4. Check “send email letting evaluators know they have been added” if you want to notify the person
  5. Click “Add User” to add the evaluator
  6. Once added, DO NOT toggle the limited view option. If you limit the view, they will not see your data.

Naming convention:

Name your assessment something that your department chair or assessment coordinator will associate with your data. Suggested naming convention:

FA2021 SUBJ 100 PLO1

This provides others with the semester the data is from, the course subject and number, and the learning outcome you are contributing data to.

General Instructions:

University of Idaho- Anthology Overview

All faculty have access to Anthology Outcomes.

The Anthology Outcomes tool provides a streamlined way to relate assessment data collected in courses with program learning outcomes. Depending on how your program has set this up, you may only need to login and navigate to the section you assessed, to report your data.

Faculty may enter data into the Anthology Outcomes tool, to report on the program learning outcome their department chair or assessment coordinator has assigned their course section.

This does require coordination by your department chair/assessment coordinator before these steps will work, and some sections may have more than one outcome assigned. Faculty teaching General Education sections will have all learning outcomes assigned to their section, and will need to choose a minimum of 2 learning outcomes to report on.

If this has been done, the faculty member can login to Anthology Outcomes and follow these steps: (Faculty can also follow these steps to see if they have any outcomes assigned to one of their sections)

1. Toggle the View Mode from “Results Center” to “Full Site.” The “Results Center” requires an integration with our LMS, which is not yet supported.

Option 2-1

2. Verify you are looking at the correct year. Data from a Spring 2021 course, would be entered under Academic Year 2020.

Academic Year 2020: Fall 2020-Spring 2021
Academic Year 2021: Fall 2021-Spring 2022

Then click on the “Star” shown below. This will show you sections available to you, for entering assessment data.

Option 2-2

3. Select the section you are reporting data for, using the navigation menu at the left.

Option 2-3

4. If your section has been assigned a program learning outcome to report on, you will find the pending connection here. You can use the filter, to select “assigned” items. You can also see “pending connections” by clicking on the small clock icon and viewing the pending connection panel. In the example below, this course has been assigned a “Communication” outcome.

Option 2-4

5. Click on the blue hyperlink to accept the connection, and it will now open a screen where you can enter this data. It should look similar to this:

Option 2-5

6. Click the “Assessment” box to add data collected in your section. The system will now ask you some questions about how you assessed your students:

a. Enter a name or title for your assessment (Example: Exam or Senior Thesis)
b. Select how you will enter your results (total percentage met, or individual student scores) Select “individual student scores” if you are importing data from Anthology Rubrics (option 1). By doing this, the system will prompt you to import your results in Step 8.
c. Select a scale type (standard or pass/fail)
d. Enter your threshold for the category(ies) of your chosen scale
e. Click on “submit” to complete this report section

Option 2-6

7. Your report on your assessment will now show under “Assessments,” as shown in the example below. When you are ready to enter your results from this assessment, you will do so by clicking the blue “Add Results” hyperlink. You can also upload any supporting evidence (such as a copy of the assignment or test used to evaluate students) by clicking on the paperclip icon to the right of “Add Results.”

Option 2-7

8. To enter your assessment data, a new form will appear when you clicked “Add Results.” Complete this form and hit “submit.” Your reporting for this outcome is complete.

For more information, see these links below:

In some cases, faculty may be asked to provide assessment data not using Anthology tools. Some programs have developed their own reporting tools or internal assessment system and then someone is tasked with entering data collected into Anthology at a later date.

Please work with your department chair or assessment coordinator, if your program uses a reporting tool other than Anthology.

An integration with Anthology and our learning management system (LMS) is expected in January 2022. This option will be updated when available and will give faculty the new option to pull over assessment data from assignments scored in the LMS.

Physical Address:
Associate Director
Assessment and Accreditation
Admin, Room 325
Moscow, ID 83844-3163

Mailing Address:
875 Perimeter Drive MS 3163
Moscow, ID 83844-3163

Phone: 208-885-5962


Web: Assessment and Accreditation